Ducks Unlimited Member Forums




No More Money From Me Until DU Finds A New Trainer

Author Message
 Posted 9/12/2012 4:42:55 PM
 

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 10/13/2013 12:24:40 PM
Posts: 1,196, Visits: 16,775
I find it increasingly difficult to justify donating money to an organization (Ducks Unlimited) that prints articles opposing the use of E-collars. Please read the second paragraph in the article. 

Post #769943
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 9/12/2012 5:52:48 PM
 

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 5 hours ago
Posts: 1,206, Visits: 7,715
I use e-collars as well, but I don't see the article as offensive as it is simply a description of one particular view that one particular trainer holds. I'm sure at some point e-collars will become obsolete, as nearly everything in existence does over time. If he has found a way to get as good or better results without one, why turn a blind eye instead of considering the possibility?

"When you hear my third shot.....that's your signal to take 'em."
-Phil Robertson
Post #769945
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 9/12/2012 7:11:09 PM
 

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 10/13/2013 12:24:40 PM
Posts: 1,196, Visits: 16,775
flannel (9/12/2012)
I use e-collars as well, but I don't see the article as offensive as it is simply a description of one particular view that one particular trainer holds. I'm sure at some point e-collars will become obsolete, as nearly everything in existence does over time. If he has found a way to get as good or better results without one, why turn a blind eye instead of considering the possibility?
Ding! Ding! Ding! You are exactly right Flannel! This is why I am so Pissed off. DU gives him a platform to market his product, with my money, and like you said, "I am sure at some point e-collars will become obsolete". That is what is so frustrating! It is because of people like him that collars will become illegal. I cannot wait to get back to the good old humane days of training. :laugh: 
You don't think this is a negative comment?
"He eschews the use of shock collars and does not submit his retrievers to the rigors of force-fetching."
 E-collar training is an effective and humane way to train. You said he has found "as good or better results" Where's the proof? 


Post #769948
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 9/12/2012 8:05:35 PM
 

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 1/17/2014 9:17:51 AM
Posts: 710, Visits: 5,310
I eschew being politically correct :w00t: 
Post #769949
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 9/13/2012 1:59:29 PM
 

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 5 hours ago
Posts: 1,206, Visits: 7,715
Pit Boss (9/12/2012)
flannel (9/12/2012)
I use e-collars as well, but I don't see the article as offensive as it is simply a description of one particular view that one particular trainer holds. I'm sure at some point e-collars will become obsolete, as nearly everything in existence does over time. If he has found a way to get as good or better results without one, why turn a blind eye instead of considering the possibility?
Ding! Ding! Ding! You are exactly right Flannel! This is why I am so Pissed off. DU gives him a platform to market his product, with my money, and like you said, "I am sure at some point e-collars will become obsolete". That is what is so frustrating! It is because of people like him that collars will become illegal. I cannot wait to get back to the good old humane days of training. :laugh: 
You don't think this is a negative comment?
"He eschews the use of shock collars and does not submit his retrievers to the rigors of force-fetching."
 E-collar training is an effective and humane way to train. You said he has found "as good or better results" Where's the proof? 


I said IF he has found "as good or better results." I rarely rely on e-collars as it is, I use one occasionally to speed-up or solidify a certain command that isn't being fulfilled to my expectations. If you're so reliant on e-collars and feel that much anxiety about not using one, maybe it's time for a new training program(?).

"When you hear my third shot.....that's your signal to take 'em."
-Phil Robertson
Post #769965
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 9/13/2012 4:51:15 PM
 

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 10/13/2013 12:24:40 PM
Posts: 1,196, Visits: 16,775
My mistake, I thought you actually had proof that he has produced as good or better results without the e-collar. So if you have no knowledge of him having any success or being as successful as e-collar trainers, why do you come out in support of him? If you use a collar, why on earth would you support someone that opposes the use of one and that speaks publicly against the use of them? That makes absolutely no sense at all. I can see if he is producing FC's, but he is not. Every week e-collar trained dogs are earning their AFCs, FCs, NFCs, NAFC titles. How many tennis shoe trained dogs are titled each year? How many using the Wildrose method?
I need to be clear, I am by no means opposed to an individual electing to train without a collar. I am opposed to an individual slamming e-collars. I am really opposed to DU giving him a platform to promote his anti collar agenda with my money. If you want proof how effective they are, go to your nearest trial and ask the people running their dogs if they use an e-collar? If you can train just as good a dog without the e-collar, why do you suppose Mike Lardy, Danny Farmer, Dave Rorem, Roy Gonia... still use one? 

I thought you might want to look at this list of retriever hall of famers. I didn't see Mike Stewarts name on the list. Perhaps I just missed it. I would think with his effective non-collar methods of training that he would definitely be right up there with Lardy and Gonia?

Post #769969
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 9/14/2012 9:15:45 AM
 

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 5 hours ago
Posts: 1,206, Visits: 7,715
Well, I wouldn't say I'm supportive of him, but if it sounded that way I can see where you're coming from. All I really meant was, if some has found an equally or even a more effective way of training without utilizing an e-collar, why oppose it just because that method/trainer prefers not to use them? I'm not saying he has created success or that Stewart even knows what the hell he's talking about. It's been my experience that the people who create the biggest uproar in opposition to e-collars, are also the ones who wouldn't recognize one if you placed one in their hands. If at some point a good, competent trainer did discover another, more effective method that did not necessarily include e-collars, why not at least consider the possibility and investigate further before condemning the method simply based on the absence of e-collars? 

"When you hear my third shot.....that's your signal to take 'em."
-Phil Robertson


Edited: 9/14/2012 9:23:21 AM by flannel
Post #769987
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 9/14/2012 1:35:36 PM
 

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 9/7/2014 7:34:58 PM
Posts: 185, Visits: 2,075
Some of his methods differ from techniques employed by other dog trainers, but they work for him. Proof is in the finished product. Included among his long list of fine retrievers are Ducks Unlimited mascots Drake and Deke.

This is in the first paragraph. If his methods work for him, I'm fine with that. I know that you have had VERY successful results with e-collars, but Drake was a good dog, and now Deke is holding the banner. Maybe they wouldn't win titles. But if they can effectively and efficiently deliver a downed duck to hand, that completes their job, doesn't it? I don't think that he should be the one to tell you not to use an e-collar, because that's his opinion, and for other dog trainers, it's not his decision. Personally, I have found an e-collar very useful in training, but I'm not going to tell everyone to use one. If you can train a rock solid, enthusiastic and energetic, efficient retriever using a certain method, (barring of course physical abuse such as can openers and rat shot) CONGRATULATIONS! Enjoy him for his whole life and take pride in what you have accomplished!:)
Post #769991
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 9/14/2012 2:11:24 PM
 

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 10/20/2014 9:17:19 PM
Posts: 1,059, Visits: 5,307
hunter951 (9/14/2012)
Some of his methods differ from techniques employed by other dog trainers, but they work for him. Proof is in the finished product. Included among his long list of fine retrievers are Ducks Unlimited mascots Drake and Deke.
This is in the first paragraph. If his methods work for him, I'm fine with that. I know that you have had VERY successful results with e-collars, but Drake was a good dog, and now Deke is holding the banner. Maybe they wouldn't win titles. But if they can effectively and efficiently deliver a downed duck to hand, that completes their job, doesn't it? I don't think that he should be the one to tell you not to use an e-collar, because that's his opinion, and for other dog trainers, it's not his decision. Personally, I have found an e-collar very useful in training, but I'm not going to tell everyone to use one. If you can train a rock solid, enthusiastic and energetic, efficient retriever using a certain method, (barring of course physical abuse such as can openers and rat shot) CONGRATULATIONS! Enjoy him for his whole life and take pride in what you have accomplished!:)


OK here's the main issue many American lab guys have with Mike Stewart....he markets his dogs by making negative statements about why our American dogs are inferior. And many of the statements really aren't true but he is great at getting people to drink the Kool-aide. I've seen some non-Wildrose brit bred dogs run Master stakes that were nice dogs.  I've got no problem with Brit dogs. The issue I (and many others) have is his continued bashing of American labs and our training methods. The bigger issue now is because of his relationship with DU he has a large pulpit from which he can spew this marketing. And those with no clue think that because he is with DU that he must be the best dog trainer. Not so much. He may, however, be the best marketing guy is dog breeding history. See quote below from his own website to see one example of what I'm saying. Hope this helps...    

Many American-bred Labs have been indiscriminantly bred for color, confirmation, or convenience often with little regard to game-finding instinct, trainability or natural retrieving desire. Other matings have resulted in a hyperactive, head strong, or hard dog that may prove too high powered or "hardheaded" for the average sportsman.

Some of the deficiencies that may occur in the American Lab have been masked by force training methods. For instance, a British trainer discards a hard-mouth or hyperactive dog and does not repeat the mating. American handlers have tendencies to "train it out" through force conditioning methods. Unfortunately if such an animal is later bred, the deficit is likely transferred to future generations.


Edited: 9/14/2012 2:13:29 PM by Tim Price
Post #769992
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook
 Posted 9/14/2012 8:40:32 PM
 

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 10/13/2013 12:24:40 PM
Posts: 1,196, Visits: 16,775
hunter951 (9/14/2012)
Some of his methods differ from techniques employed by other dog trainers, but they work for him. Proof is in the finished product. Included among his long list of fine retrievers are Ducks Unlimited mascots Drake and Deke.

This is in the first paragraph. If his methods work for him, I'm fine with that. I know that you have had VERY successful results with e-collars, but Drake was a good dog, and now Deke is holding the banner. Maybe they wouldn't win titles. But if they can effectively and efficiently deliver a downed duck to hand, that completes their job, doesn't it? I don't think that he should be the one to tell you not to use an e-collar, because that's his opinion, and for other dog trainers, it's not his decision. Personally, I have found an e-collar very useful in training, but I'm not going to tell everyone to use one. If you can train a rock solid, enthusiastic and energetic, efficient retriever using a certain method, (barring of course physical abuse such as can openers and rat shot) CONGRATULATIONS! Enjoy him for his whole life and take pride in what you have accomplished!:)
Deke? Now there 's a stylish dog! DU you should be proud of that dog. I think a dead turtle has more drive than Deke. I would like to see what that dog would do if you sailed a goose 300 yards? What titles do Deke and Drake have? His dogs look like they couldn't find an Penguin in a bathroom. They may find it but I think I would fall asleep watching the retrieve.
I need to repeat that I am not telling anyone to train with a collar, and I can care less if you train without one. I just do not want to read his marketing BS anymore. IMO, George Hull said it best...


Post #770001
Add to Twitter Add to Facebook


Similar Topics

Expand / Collapse